← Back to Indigo Alert Canada Educational Resource

Understanding the gap in emergency alerts for vulnerable people.

This page explains wandering and elopement, who is at risk, why existing alert systems were not designed for these situations, and what communities and families can do right now. It is produced by Indigo Alert Canada in furtherance of our charitable purpose: advancing public safety education and community preparedness for vulnerable missing people.

Start reading

What is wandering and elopement?

Wandering and elopement refer to situations where a person leaves a safe environment without the knowledge or supervision of their caregiver, placing themselves at serious risk of harm.

In clinical and safety literature, these terms are often used interchangeably, though they carry slightly different meanings. Wandering typically describes aimless or disoriented movement, most commonly associated with dementia or acquired brain injuries. Elopement often describes a more purposeful departure, even if the person is unaware of the danger, and is more commonly used in the autism community.

What both have in common is the outcome: a person who cannot reliably communicate their name, location, or need for help is somewhere unknown, unable to self-rescue, and at immediate risk of injury or death.

🧠

Elopement

Leaving a known-safe area, often toward a known destination or interest (a pool, a familiar route, a sensory draw). Common in autism spectrum disorder, Down syndrome, and other developmental conditions. The person may not perceive the journey as dangerous.

🧋

Wandering

Disoriented movement without a clear destination, often associated with Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia, acquired brain injury, or conditions affecting spatial and temporal orientation. The person may not know where they are or how to return.

Who is at risk?

Wandering and elopement affect a broad range of people across all ages. The common thread is a condition that impairs communication, spatial awareness, danger recognition, or the ability to self-rescue.

Developmental Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) The most studied group. Nearly half of autistic children have eloped at least once after age 4. Elopement is one of the leading causes of injury and death in this population.
Neurodegenerative Alzheimer's and Dementia The Alzheimer Society of Canada estimates that 6 in 10 people with dementia will wander at some point. Disorientation at night is especially common. Outcomes worsen significantly with hypothermia exposure.
Developmental Down Syndrome Individuals with Down syndrome may have limited verbal communication skills and impaired danger recognition, increasing elopement risk in new or unfamiliar environments.
Acquired Acquired Brain Injury (ABI) Brain injuries from stroke, trauma, or infection can impair judgment, memory, and navigation, leading to wandering behaviors that the person may not recognize as dangerous.
Psychiatric Other Cognitive and Psychiatric Conditions Severe intellectual disabilities, certain psychotic disorders, and some seizure disorders can all result in vulnerable situations where a person cannot communicate their need for help.

This is not an exhaustive list. The common risk factor is any condition that reduces a person's ability to recognize danger, communicate their situation, or return to safety without help.

The data behind the gap

Wandering and elopement are well-documented safety crises. The statistics below represent the best available published evidence as of 2026.

49%
of children with autism spectrum disorder have eloped or wandered at least once after age 4.
Anderson et al., Pediatrics, 2012 (Kennedy Krieger Institute)
160×
the drowning risk faced by autistic individuals compared to the general pediatric population.
Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health, 2017
>70%
of wandering-related fatalities in the autism population are caused by drowning. In 2024, U.S. data showed this figure at 91%.
National Autism Association, 2017 and 2024
6 in 10
people with dementia will wander at some point during their illness, often at night or in unfamiliar settings.
Alzheimer Society of Canada
0
Silver Alerts issued in Alberta since the program was created in 2017. The legislation exists. The tool has not been used at the broadcast level in nearly a decade.
Alberta Emergency Alert archive, verified September 2026
0/13
provinces and territories in Canada currently have a broadcast-level alert specifically for vulnerable missing people who have not been abducted.
Indigo Alert Canada campaign research, 2026

Note on the 65% / 24% traffic and water danger figures: Some advocacy materials cite that 65% of elopement cases expose the person to traffic danger and 24% to water. These figures circulate widely and appear to originate from the National Autism Association's 2011 survey of families. We are working to obtain the primary source and will update this page with a direct citation. Until then, we have excluded them from our primary stat display to maintain accuracy.

Correction note: Some versions of this campaign have cited "75% of fatal drownings involving autistic children occur during elopement." The actual published finding is the inverse: more than 70% of wandering-related fatalities are caused by drowning. We have corrected our materials to reflect the sourced figure and cite the Columbia/Mailman 2017 study for the 160× drowning risk comparison.

Why existing alerts fall short

Canada has emergency alert infrastructure that can reach every cell phone in a province within seconds. The gap is not in the technology. It is in the criteria for when that technology gets used.

The Amber Alert criteria

The Amber Alert is an exceptional tool for what it was built to do: respond to suspected child abductions. The criteria that trigger an Amber Alert in Canada generally require:

  • A child 18 years of age or under is missing;
  • Police believe the child's life is in danger; and
  • There is reason to believe the child has been abducted.

The third criterion is the gap. A non-verbal autistic child who wanders from a day home, or a senior with dementia who walks away from their care facility, does not meet it. There is no suspect. There is no evidence of abduction. And so, under the current system, no broadcast-level alert goes out.

The Silver Alert in Alberta

Alberta created a Silver Alert program in 2017 specifically to address the gap for seniors with dementia and other vulnerable adults. On paper, this was exactly the right idea. In practice, the Alberta Emergency Alert archive shows zero Silver Alerts issued at the broadcast level since the program's creation. The legislation exists. The awareness does not. This is both a warning for future alert programs and evidence that legislation alone is not enough, which is why this campaign is focused on implementation, training, and public awareness alongside policy change.

Amber Alert

Designed for abduction

  • Requires evidence of abduction
  • Child (18 and under)
  • Widely known and trusted
  • Criteria exclude vulnerable wanderers
  • Frequently activated across Canada
Proposed: Indigo Alert

Designed for vulnerable wanderers

  • Triggered by documented vulnerability, not abduction
  • Any age (autism, dementia, ABI, etc.)
  • Narrow criteria to prevent alert fatigue
  • Fills the gap where Amber Alert cannot apply
  • Does not replace or modify Amber Alert

How an Indigo Alert would work

An Indigo Alert would be a new tier in Canada's public alerting system, activated alongside but separately from Amber Alert, using the existing Alert Ready / Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) infrastructure that already reaches every compatible cell phone in a province.

The proposed trigger criteria share Amber Alert's discipline: narrow and specific, to prevent alert fatigue and preserve public trust. A preliminary framework might include:

  • The missing person has a documented condition that impairs their ability to communicate, recognize danger, or self-rescue (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, dementia, Down syndrome, acquired brain injury);
  • Law enforcement has confirmed the person is missing and determined there is immediate risk of serious harm; and
  • There is no evidence of abduction (which would trigger Amber Alert instead).

Alert fatigue is a real concern. Amber Alert works because people take it seriously, and they take it seriously because it is used rarely and only when the criteria are clear. An Indigo Alert must follow the same discipline. The goal is not a large number of alerts that people learn to tune out. It is a small number of alerts that people respond to because the criteria are trusted.

How Alert Ready delivers alerts

Alert Ready is Canada's national public alerting system, operated by Pelmorex Media and coordinating authorities at the federal, provincial, and territorial level. When a broadcast-level alert is issued in a province, it is distributed simultaneously via:

  • Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA): A direct cell broadcast message to compatible devices in the target area. This does not require any app or opt-in. It interrupts the phone with an audible tone.
  • Radio and television broadcast interruption: All broadcasters in the covered area are required to carry the alert.
  • Cable and satellite TV interruption.

Because alert authority rests with individual provinces and territories under their own emergency management legislation, each province must adopt Indigo Alert criteria independently. The federal government can convene, fund, and encourage, but it cannot create a national alert category by itself. This is why the campaign focuses province by province.

What families can do right now

While the policy work continues, there are concrete steps families can take today to reduce risk and improve outcomes if a vulnerable person goes missing. These are not a substitute for a better alert system. They are what families are left doing in its absence.

  1. Register with the RCMP Vulnerable Persons Registry (VPR)

    The RCMP's VPR is a confidential database that gives first responders immediate access to photos, physical descriptions, communication abilities, known locations of interest, and caregiver contact information when a registered person is reported missing. Registration is free and voluntary. Contact your local RCMP detachment or police service to register. Urban police forces (e.g., Calgary Police Service, Edmonton Police Service) have their own equivalent programs.

  2. Enroll in MedicAlert's SafetyNet program

    MedicAlert Foundation Canada's SafetyNet program connects vulnerable individuals with a 24/7 emergency response service. If someone is found by a member of the public or a first responder, the ID on the SafetyNet bracelet connects them immediately to your caregiver network and medical profile. This is especially critical for non-verbal individuals.

  3. Install door and window sensors

    Simple smart home sensors on exterior doors and ground-floor windows alert caregivers immediately when a door is opened. Many are inexpensive and compatible with standard smart home systems. Door alarms with audible tones can also deter or slow elopement long enough for a caregiver to respond.

  4. Consider GPS tracking

    Wearable GPS devices designed for people with autism or dementia allow real-time location monitoring and geofencing, where the device sends an alert if the person leaves a designated area. Options include dedicated devices (AngelSense, Jiobit, Apple AirTag-based solutions) and specialized medical GPS watches. Ask your provincial autism or Alzheimer society if any subsidy programs exist in your province.

  5. Brief your neighbours and community

    Let immediate neighbours know about your family member's condition, appearance, and any known areas they may walk toward. A community that knows what to look for is a faster response network than any single technology. Share a recent photo, the person's name if they can respond to it, and a caregiver contact number.

  6. Create a "go bag" for a missing-person response

    Prepare in advance: a current photo (updated at least annually), written physical description, list of known locations of interest (favourite park, a specific store, a body of water), list of sensory triggers and calming techniques, and all caregiver contact numbers. When time matters, having this ready to hand to police saves critical minutes.

  7. Know water locations near your home

    Given that drowning is the leading cause of wandering-related fatalities, identify every body of water within a kilometre of your home: ponds, retention basins, rivers, ditches, and storm drain systems. Communicate these to first responders immediately if your family member goes missing, and ask police to prioritize those locations. If safe to do so, search them yourself while waiting for police.

For first responders and community members

If you encounter someone who appears disoriented, non-responsive to questions, or unsafe near traffic or water, here is what to know.

🚨 If you find someone who may be a vulnerable missing person

  • Call 911 immediately. Do not wait.
  • Do not leave the person alone near water or a road.
  • Speak calmly and slowly. Avoid sudden movements or loud tones.
  • Do not restrain the person unless they are in immediate danger of injury.
  • Look for medical ID (MedicAlert bracelet, card, or device).
  • Note their exact location and describe their appearance to the dispatcher.

🔍 If you are helping search for a missing vulnerable person

  • Register with the organized search team before searching independently.
  • Prioritize water: rivers, ponds, storm drains, and retention areas first.
  • Call the person's name if known. Some individuals will not respond but may freeze or stop moving when they hear it.
  • Check fenced yards, sheds, and enclosed spaces. Vulnerable individuals may seek enclosure for sensory comfort.
  • Share any finds immediately with search coordinators, not on social media first.
"The danger existed from the moment Parker went missing. The system just didn't have a way to tell anyone." Summary of the case that started this campaign, as reflected in federal opposition correspondence, August 2026.

Sources used on this page

Indigo Alert Canada is committed to accuracy. All statistics and claims on this page are sourced from published research or primary records. We correct our materials when better evidence is available.

Primary sources

  1. Anderson, C., Law, J. K., Daniels, A., Rice, C., Mandell, D. S., Hagopian, L., & Law, P. A. (2012). Occurrence and family impact of elopement in children with autism spectrum disorders. Pediatrics, 130(5), 870–877. Kennedy Krieger summary →
  2. Columbia University's Mailman School of Public Health. (2017). Drowning risk in autism: 160 times the general pediatric population. Cited by the National Autism Association. NAA drowning risk page →
  3. National Autism Association. (2017, updated 2024). Wandering-related fatalities: drowning as cause of death. NAA reports drowning accounts for more than 70% of wandering-related fatalities (2017); 91% in the 2024 U.S. data. NAA water safety →
  4. Alzheimer Society of Canada. Wandering in dementia. Estimate: 6 in 10 people with dementia will wander at some point. alzheimer.ca →
  5. Alberta Emergency Alert archive (alberta.ca). Verified September 2026: zero Silver Alerts issued at the broadcast level since the Alberta Silver Alert program was established in 2017. Alberta alert archive →
  6. Global News, Calgary Herald, CBC News, CTV News: Coverage of the Parker Wells case, July–August 2026. Sources listed on the press page.
Statistics under review: The figures "65% of elopement cases involve traffic danger" and "24% involve water danger" appear in multiple advocacy sources and likely originate from a 2011 National Autism Association family survey. We are seeking the primary source document and will update when confirmed. We have not included them as primary statistics until the citation is verified.

See an error? Have a better source? Email us at hello@indigoalertcanada.com and we will review and correct promptly.

Help raise awareness with your representative.

Sharing this educational resource and contacting your provincial representative helps ensure decision-makers understand the gap and the evidence behind it.